Thanks for the response. A few comments inline. I removed sections that don't
seem to need further comment.
On Jul 22, 2013, at 6:55 AM, Philipp Kewisch wrote:
>
> On 7/17/13 12:27 AM, Ben Campbell wrote:
[...]
>> -- 3.2.1.1:
>>
>> What happens for future versions of vCard? Do you simply us
> Finnish is not a problem :-) but I do not know how to edit my row once
> entered, as I realized that I made a mistake - my Thursday lunch slot is also
> busy and I should have marked it with an X
I don't think there is an edit option, but I can take that into account.
(Sumpli was my panic sol
Finnish is not a problem :-) but I do not know how to edit my row once entered,
as I realized that I made a mistake - my Thursday lunch slot is also busy and I
should have marked it with an X
Regards,
Dan
From: gen-art-boun...@ietf.org [gen-art-boun...@
Le 2013-07-22 13:55, Philipp Kewisch a écrit :
>> -- 3.2.1.1:
>>
>> What happens for future versions of vCard? Do you simply use the new version
>> number, or would we need a new version of this spec? I suspect the latter.
>> If true, it might be worth mentioning that, or somewhere early in the d
I am very happy about what the Gen-ART is doing - I now fully realise how
important your service is, for both me personally and for the IETF. Thank you!
I'd love to get together with the team in Berlin, to discuss how the last few
months have gone and innovate how we might work even better in th
On 7/17/13 12:27 AM, Ben Campbell wrote:
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
< http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
Please wait for direction from your document shepherd
or AD before posting a new version of th
Hi, Tomak and Kim.
I had a quick look through -07 and it appeared to have fixed all my
quibbles.
I see the draft has now been approved - so hopefully it will progress to
RFC RSN!
Regards,
Elwyn
On Thu, 2013-07-18 at 19:34 +0200, Tomek Mrugalski wrote:
> On 17.07.2013 16:41, Elwyn Davies wrote:
