[Gen-art] Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-avtcore-leap-second-06

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at . Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-ietf-avtcore-leap-second-06 Revi

Re: [Gen-art] spec size and organization, was: Fwd: [httpbis] #523: Gen-ART Last Call review draft-ietf-httpbis-p1-messaging-25

Hi Julian, I agree that it may be too late to make drastic changes. Please consider the below comments though, it may help: " Constructive comment: -Perhaps in part 1 give a suggestion on how to use/read these documents (RFCs). Could any of them be skipped at first for a simple implemen

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review draft-ietf-httpbis-p6-cache-25

Hi, Thanks Mark. Best Regards, Meral -Original Message- From: Mark Nottingham [mailto:m...@mnot.net] Sent: Thursday, December 05, 2013 7:23 PM To: Meral Shirazipour Cc: HTTP Working Group; gen-art@ietf.org Subject: Re: Gen-ART Last Call review draft-ietf-httpbis-p6-cache-25 Hi Meral,

[Gen-art] spec size and organization, was: Fwd: [httpbis] #523: Gen-ART Last Call review draft-ietf-httpbis-p1-messaging-25

-General comment 1, I am not very keen with the idea of splitting the http standard in so many RFCs. It is hard to follow and the protocol is not complex enough to justify these lengthy documents. I would have rather see 1 concise standard RFC and few Extension RFCs, Informational or