[Gen-art] Gen-art telechat review of draft-pal-eidr-urn-02

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at < http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft. Document: draft-pal-eidr-urn-02.tx

[Gen-art] A *new* batch of IETF LC reviews - 2014-05-28

Hi all, The following reviewers have assignments: Reviewer LC end Draft - Robert Sparks 2014-06-09 draft-ietf-v6ops-enterprise-incremental-ipv6-05 Russ Housley 2014-06-10 draft-ietf-v6ops-clatip-02

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-ipfix-text-adt-05

hi David, Many thanks for the review. Comments and questions inline. On 24 May 2014, at 04:10, Black, David wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on > Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at > > . > > Please

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-art LC review of draft-pal-eidr-urn-01

Elwyn & Pierre-Anthony: thank you for the review and responses. I have balloted no-obj for tomorrow’s IESG telechat. Jari On 25 Apr 2014, at 19:53, Elwyn Davies wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on > Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at > >

Re: [Gen-art] GenART review of draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv4-over-dhcpv6

Dan: many thanks for your review. Qi: thanks for the updates. Jari smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Re: [Gen-art] review of draft-ietf-sidr-policy-qualifiers-01.txt

Thanks for your review, Francis. Jari On 03 Mar 2014, at 10:56, Francis Dupont wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on > Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at > > . > > Please resolve these comments along

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART telechat review of draft-ietf-pwe3-p2mp-pw-requirements-09.txt

Thanks for your review, Brian. Jari On 24 May 2014, at 06:26, Brian E Carpenter wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on > Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at > < http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. > > Please wait for direction from your d

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-kivinen-ipsecme-ikev2-rfc5996bis-03

Many thanks for your review, Suresh. I have also reviewed the changes in this draft wrt RFC 5996 and I agree that it is ready to move forward. Thanks for writing this, Tero. Jari On 28 May 2014, at 08:41, Suresh Krishnan wrote: > I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART)

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-art LC review of draft-ietf-mmusic-latching-05

> I was thinking of addressing them all in bulk once all the IESG > comments were in. Apologies if that's considered a poor practice. I'll > try to respond to all of them today. We generally hold document updates and batch them (though that varies too), but individual responses, sooner, is usually

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-art LC review of draft-ietf-mmusic-latching-05

Hey Jari, all, On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 2:19 PM, Jari Arkko wrote: > Elwyn: many thanks for your review. Authors, do you have any responses or > corrections, > based on the s5 minor issue and nits listed below? I was thinking of addressing them all in bulk once all the IESG comments were in. Apo

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-ipfix-text-adt-05

Brian, Thanks for the response. Regarding Unicode string normalization and preparation, if those were appropriate, they should have been introduced in RFC 7011, and picked up here by reference. If there's an actual problem that requires those techniques (unclear), a revision to RFC 7011 would be

Re: [Gen-art] review of draft-ietf-idr-last-as-reservation-04.txt

Francis: thank you very much for your detailed review. And thank you Jon for the fix in -05. I have balloted no-obj. Jari smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/li

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-art LC review of draft-ietf-mmusic-latching-05

Elwyn: many thanks for your review. Authors, do you have any responses or corrections, based on the s5 minor issue and nits listed below? Jari On 27 May 2014, at 19:35, Elwyn Davies wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on > Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at >

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-bfd-tc-mib-08

Thank you Christer for your effort in careful review of this draft. Jari smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-bfd-mib-20

On 23 May 2014, at 03:11, Nobo Akiya (nobo) wrote: > Thanks for the time spent reviewing this draft again David! +1 I have posted a no-objection position for this document, for tomorrow’s IESG call. Jari smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature ___

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-eastlake-iana-cfm-considerations-01

Thanks for the careful review, Peter. And thanks for the -02, Donald. Jari On 29 Apr 2014, at 18:28, Donald Eastlake wrote: > Hi Peter, > > I'm fine with all of your suggestion. Thanks for the review. > > Donald > = > Donald E. Eastlake 3rd +1-508-333-2270 (cell)