Re: [Gen-art] GenART review of draft-ietf-l2vpn-evpn-10

We¹ll do. Thanks, Ali On 10/17/14, 1:23 PM, "Adrian Farrel" wrote: > >> BTW, since these are just editorial changes, I will just give them to >>the >> RFC editor, unless you want me to check the new rev in. > >Give them the edits and ask whether they'd like a new rev. > >Thanks, >Adrian > __

Re: [Gen-art] GenART review of draft-ietf-l2vpn-evpn-10

> BTW, since these are just editorial changes, I will just give them to the > RFC editor, unless you want me to check the new rev in. Give them the edits and ask whether they'd like a new rev. Thanks, Adrian ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org

Re: [Gen-art] GenART review of draft-ietf-l2vpn-evpn-10

Martin, thanks for your comments and Adrian, thanks for your input & suggestions. Adrian, I will go ahead and add the paragraph that you suggested to the beginning of section 5. Also, several comments revolve around the motivation of this draft and what it tries to solve, etc. Although this is

[Gen-art] Genart LC review: draft-ietf-pce-wson-routing-wavelength

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at . Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-ietf-pce-wson-routing-wavelength-

Re: [Gen-art] GenART review of draft-ietf-l2vpn-evpn-10

Resend with Martin's correct email > -Original Message- > From: iesg [mailto:iesg-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Adrian Farrel > Sent: 17 October 2014 12:05 > To: martin.thom...@andrew.com > Cc: draft-ietf-l2vpn-evpn@tools.ietf.org; gen-art@ietf.org; i...@ietf.org > Subject: RE: GenART

Re: [Gen-art] GenART review of draft-ietf-l2vpn-evpn-10

Hi Martin, I firmly believe that all reviews are good reviews, and thank you for the time you have put into this. You'll understand, of course, the squawking noise made by the authors who received your review the day after the IESG discussed your document on the telechat. In fact, the last Discus