Re: [Gen-art] Gen-art LC review: draft-ietf-precis-saslprepbis-15

2015-04-22 Thread Robert Sparks
On 4/22/15 5:50 AM, Alexey Melnikov wrote: Hi Robert, On 21/04/2015 21:21, Robert Sparks wrote: Nit: The introduction calls out email addresses as an example of the kinds of strings these methods are not intended for use in preparing (along with LDAP distinguished names). But in the body

[Gen-art] review of draft-ietf-scim-api-16.txt

2015-04-22 Thread Francis Dupont
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq. Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-ietf-scim-api-16.txt Reviewer:

Re: [Gen-art] review of draft-ietf-scim-api-16.txt

2015-04-22 Thread Phil Hunt
Francis, Thanks for your detailed review. Much appreciated! I will revise the document as suggested in the coming week. Thanks! Phil Hunt On Apr 22, 2015, at 08:06, Francis Dupont francis.dup...@fdupont.fr wrote: I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-art LC review: draft-ietf-precis-saslprepbis-15

2015-04-22 Thread Alexey Melnikov
Hi Robert, On 21/04/2015 21:21, Robert Sparks wrote: Nit: The introduction calls out email addresses as an example of the kinds of strings these methods are not intended for use in preparing (along with LDAP distinguished names). But in the body of the document, email addresses (or strings