Hi Sandy,
> I just replied to Russ's message before I read your response.
>
> The draft language is just as Russ said.
[MZ] That's OK :)
>
>It is important that the VLAN membership of all the RBridge ports in
>an LAALP MUST be the same. Any inconsistencies in VLAN membership
>may
Hi Sandra,
On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 4:20 PM, Sandra Murphy wrote:
> On Aug 27, 2015, at 5:59 PM, Russ Housley wrote:
>
>>
>> (3) In Section 11, we learn that the VLAN membership of all the
>> RBridge ports in an LAALP MUST be the same. Any
On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 6:05 PM, Black, David wrote:
> The Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of the -13 version of this draft does not
> appear to have been directly addressed in the -15 version.
>
> Of the 5 minor issues, other changes have addressed issue [4] and the
> first part
On Aug 27, 2015, at 5:59 PM, Russ Housley wrote:
>
> (3) In Section 11, we learn that the VLAN membership of all the
> RBridge ports in an LAALP MUST be the same. Any inconsistencies in
> VLAN membership may result in packet loss or non-shortest paths.
> Is there
On Aug 30, 2015, at 11:54 PM, Mingui Zhang wrote:
> Hi Russ,
>
>
>>
>> (3) In Section 11, we learn that the VLAN membership of all the RBridge
>> ports
>> in an LAALP MUST be the same. Any inconsistencies in VLAN membership
>> may result in packet loss or
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART,
please see the FAQ at <
http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a
new version of the draft.
Document: