I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For more information, please see the FAQ at
Hi Brian, Hannes,
On 08/09/15 20:24, Hannes Tschofenig wrote:
>> > The downref to RFC7251 was not mentioned in the last call and that RFC
>> > isn't
>> > in the downref registry. ((Yes, I've been in the IESG and I know how
>> > annoying this can be, but it's a process glitch.))
>> >
> Thanks
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your
document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft.
For more information, please
On 15/09/2015 01:27, Stephen Farrell wrote:
>
> Hi Brian, Hannes,
>
> On 08/09/15 20:24, Hannes Tschofenig wrote:
The downref to RFC7251 was not mentioned in the last call and that RFC
isn't
in the downref registry. ((Yes, I've been in the IESG and I know how
annoying this
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your
document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft.
For more information,
On 14/09/15 21:10, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> I promise not to appeal. The downref rules are quite creaky and annoying,
> so I'd support them being overhauled anyway, as long as egregious downrefs
> can still be prevented or appealed.
Yep. Anything can always be appealed of course, and ID nits
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your
document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft.
For more information, please
On 11 Sep 2015, at 13:45, Black, David wrote:
The -04 version of this draft addresses most of the concerns noted in
the
Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of the -03 version. In particular, both of
the major process-related issues have been addressed by retargeting
the
draft to be an Informational
