[Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-v6ops-siit-dc-02

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at Document: draft-ietf-v6ops-siit-dc-02.txt Reviewer: Christer Holmberg

[Gen-art] FW: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-v6ops-siit-dc-02

Re-send with correct IETF tools e-mail address. From: Gen-art [mailto:gen-art-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Christer Holmberg Sent: 17. syyskuuta 2015 10:56 To: gen-art@ietf.org Cc: draft-ietf-v6ops-siit-dc-02@tools.ietf.org Subject: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-v6ops-siit-dc-02 I

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-v6ops-siit-dc-02

Hi, One more comment: Section 2 (Terminology): - Q2_1: Is there really a need to define the edge relay (ER) here? It is not used anywhere in the document, and it creates a cross-reference with draft-ietf-v6ops-siit-dc-2xlat - which is the document extending the SIIT

[Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-v6ops-siit-dc-2xlat-01

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at Document: draft-ietf-v6ops-siit-dc-2xlat-01.txt Reviewer: Christer Ho

Re: [Gen-art] Hi, Gen-art Telechat review of draft-ietf-mpls-mldp-node-protection-06 - follow up

Indeed, thank you Elwyn! And thank you for the changes! jari On 16 Sep 2015, at 06:40, IJsbrand Wijnands wrote: > Thanks Elwyn! > > Ice. > >> On 16 Sep 2015, at 15:32, Elwyn Davies wrote: >> >> Hi Ice. >> >> I had a quick look through the updates in -07 and that has addressed all the >> p

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-trill-pseudonode-nickname-05

Thanks for the in-depth review, Russ! Very much appreciated. I believe we still has to resolve what to do about the sort order. (Maybe this helps: I’m not actually sure why in a k-element set you order them based mod k because that would seem to produce likely duplicates. Since your backup opt

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-pals-vccv-for-gal-05

Thanks for your excellent review, Dan. Andrew, will you be issuing a new version based on the comments? Jari On 04 Sep 2015, at 08:00, Romascanu, Dan (Dan) wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review > Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being pro

Re: [Gen-art] review of draft-ietf-dhc-access-network-identifier-08.txt

Thanks for your review, Francis. Authors, you’ve taken these notes into account? Jari On 03 Jun 2015, at 07:55, Francis Dupont wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on > Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at > >

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat Call review of draft-ietf-homenet-dncp-09

Thanks for your review, Meral. Jari On 14 Sep 2015, at 23:14, Meral Shirazipour wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, > please see the FAQ at < > http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. > > Please wait for direction from you

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-dnsop-dns-terminology-04

Thanks for your in-depth review, David. And thank you authors for addressing the major concerns. Jari On 11 Sep 2015, at 13:45, Black, David wrote: > The -04 version of this draft addresses most of the concerns noted in the > Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of the -03 version. In particular, both

Re: [Gen-art] Review: draft-ietf-lwig-cellular-05

Thanks for your review (speaking as author, and if you had raised any issues I would have sent those to one of my fellow ADs.) Jari On 10 Sep 2015, at 19:44, Joel Halpern wrote: > This document is still ready for publication as an Informational RFC. > > Yours, > Joel > > On 8/13/15 10:13 PM,

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-pals-vccv-for-gal-05

On 17/09/2015 14:25, Jari Arkko wrote: Thanks for your excellent review, Dan. Andrew, will you be issuing a new version based on the comments? Yes, there will be a -06 when the resolution of all comments are agreed. Jari On 04 Sep 2015, at 08:00, Romascanu, Dan (Dan) wrote: I am the ass

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-art Telechat review: draft-mm-netconf-time-capability-08

Thanks for your review, Robert and the changes, Tal! Jari On 16 Sep 2015, at 14:38, Robert Sparks wrote: > Sorry - I didn't pick that up when I looked at the graphic -05 to -08 diff. > This text is ok, especially given (ii). > > RjS > > On 9/16/15 1:29 AM, Tal Mizrahi wrote: >> Hi Robert, >>

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-pals-vccv-for-gal-05

Thanks! Jari signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Re: [Gen-art] review of draft-ietf-dhc-access-network-identifier-08.txt

Jari - Yes. I believe Shwetha took care of these comments in -09 version. Regards Sri On 9/17/15, 6:27 AM, "Jari Arkko" wrote: >Thanks for your review, Francis. Authors, you¹ve taken these notes into >account? > >Jari > >On 03 Jun 2015, at 07:55, Francis Dupont >wrote: > >> I am the assigned

[Gen-art] A *new* batch of IETF LC reviews - 2015-09-17

Hi all, The following reviewers have assignments: Reviewer LC end Draft - Joel Halpern 2015-09-25 draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-relay-reply-10 * Meral Shirazipour 2015-10-09 draft-blanchet-ccsds-urn-00 Paul

[Gen-art] Review: draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-relay-reply-10

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For more information, please see the FAQ at

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-trill-pseudonode-nickname-05

Hi Jari, On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 9:22 AM, Jari Arkko wrote: > Thanks for the in-depth review, Russ! Very much appreciated. > > I believe we still has to resolve what to do about the sort order. > > (Maybe this helps: I’m not actually sure why in a k-element set you order > them based mod k beca