[Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat Call review of draft-ietf-6man-predictable-fragment-id-10

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft. For more information,

[Gen-art] Gen-art LC review: draft-ietf-pals-redundancy-spe-02

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For more information, please see the FAQ at

Re: [Gen-art] Review: draft-ietf-pals-mpls-tp-mac-wd

Hi, Himanshu - responses in line... > On Oct 15, 2015, at 7:44 PM 10/15/15, Shah, Himanshu wrote: > > Hi Ralph - > Thanks for your thorough review. > > Let me first address your major concern. > > As you point out, this draft builds on existing standards. > We (authors and

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC/Telechat review of draft-ietf-pals-ms-pw-protection-03

Peter, Many thanks for your review. My response is inline: On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 4:07 AM, Peter Yee wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review > Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for > the IETF

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC/Telechat review of draft-ietf-pals-ms-pw-protection-03

Peter, Thanks again, I'll take of those acronyms. Cheers, Andy On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 4:49 PM, Peter Yee wrote: > Andrew, > > > > Regarding Appendix A, that may just be my lack of deep > understanding for the MPLS-TP world. If you feel the differentiation

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC/Telechat review of draft-ietf-pals-ms-pw-protection-03

Andrew, Regarding Appendix A, that may just be my lack of deep understanding for the MPLS-TP world. If you feel the differentiation is covered, leave it as is. Acronyms that might merit expansion include PE (as used in T-PE and S-PE), PSN (one meaning is

[Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-aqm-ecn-benefits-06

I forgot to copy gen-art. Forwarded Message Subject: Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-aqm-ecn-benefits-06 Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2015 11:58:48 -0400 From: Paul Kyzivat To: draft-ietf-aqm-ecn-benefits@ietf.org (Unchanged from LC review.) I am the

[Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat Call review of draft-ietf-homenet-dncp-11

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft. For more information,

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat Call review of draft-ietf-6man-predictable-fragment-id-10

Hi, Meral, Thanks so much for your feedback! Please find my comments in-line... On 10/16/2015 07:07 PM, Meral Shirazipour wrote: [] > > Summary: This draft is ready to be published as Informational RFC. > []> > > Nits/editorial comments: > > [Page 7], "that needs to

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat Call review of draft-ietf-6man-predictable-fragment-id-10

Hi, Thank you. Best, Meral > -Original Message- > From: Fernando Gont [mailto:fg...@si6networks.com] > Sent: Friday, October 16, 2015 3:20 PM > To: Meral Shirazipour; draft-ietf-6man-predictable-fragment- > id@tools.ietf.org; gen-art@ietf.org > Subject: Re: Gen-ART Telechat Call