Re: [Gen-art] Gen-Art LC review: draft-ietf-jose-jws-signing-input-options-06

These resolutions are now published in -07. Thanks again! -Original Message- From: Mike Jones [mailto:michael.jo...@microsoft.com] Sent: Sunday, December 13, 2015 8:05 PM To: Robert Sparks ; General Area Review Team ; i...@ietf.org; j...@ietf.org; draft-ietf-jose-jws-signing-input-opti

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-Art LC review: draft-ietf-jose-jws-signing-input-options-06

Hi Robert, You asked "_WHY_ is crit not sufficient? I think that's the thing that's missing as motivation." There are two goals we're discussing, which are related: (a) Having an application that uses "b64":false work. (b) Having an application that receives a JWT with "b64":false not misinterpr

[Gen-art] Gen-art LC review of draft-ietf-nfsv4-minorversion2-dot-x-39

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For more information, please see the FAQ at

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-Art LC review: draft-ietf-jose-jws-signing-input-options-06

Cutting away a bit to focus on the question: On 12/12/15 8:32 PM, Mike Jones wrote: Hi Robert. Thanks for the useful review. Replies are inline below... -Original Message- I would have been much more comfortable with a consensus to require 'crit'. (Count me in the rough if this

[Gen-art] Gen-art LC review of draft-ietf-nfsv4-minorversion2-39

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For more information, please see the FAQ at