Re: [Gen-art] Gen-art LC review of draft-ietf-nfsv4-minorversion2-39

> On Dec 22, 2015, at 10:30 AM, Adamson, Andy > wrote: > >> >> On Dec 18, 2015, at 11:28 PM, Tom Haynes >> wrote: >> >> >>> On Dec 13, 2015, at 11:22 AM, Elwyn Davies wrote: >>> >>> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area >>> Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-art LC review of draft-ietf-nfsv4-rpcsec-gssv3-13

> On Dec 22, 2015, at 6:33 AM, Elwyn Davies wrote: > > Hi, Andy. > > Thanks for the response and the updated draft. > > I think we are done with the editorial nits. > > There is a comment about the RFC 7204 issue below - and there was a separate > email suggesting negotiation with minorversi

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-art LC review of draft-ietf-nfsv4-minorversion2-39

> On Dec 18, 2015, at 11:28 PM, Tom Haynes > wrote: > > >> On Dec 13, 2015, at 11:22 AM, Elwyn Davies wrote: >> >> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area >> Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed >> by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Pleas

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-art LC review of draft-ietf-nfsv4-rpcsec-gssv3-13

Hi, Andy. Thanks for the response and the updated draft. I think we are done with the editorial nits. There is a comment about the RFC 7204 issue below - and there was a separate email suggesting negotiation with minorversion2 authors. The reference to the original paper on MLS seems to have