I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For more information, please see the FAQ at
Of course. It's just that sometimes ADs (maybe not nowadays, but I may have
sinned once or more when I was an AD) leave 'simple' edits to the RFC Editor.
Which should be fine unless you forget to mention these in the RFC Editor notes
:-)
Regards,
Dan
> -Original Message-
> From:
On 3/21/16 8:39 AM, Romascanu, Dan (Dan) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Obviously, an explicit RFC Editor note would solve the problem in the
> majority if not all the foreseeable cases. The burden is on the AD
> and to some extent to the IESG who should minute the decision as
> 'Approved. RFC Editor Note.'
Hi,
Obviously, an explicit RFC Editor note would solve the problem in the majority
if not all the foreseeable cases. The burden is on the AD and to some extent to
the IESG who should minute the decision as 'Approved. RFC Editor Note.' and
maybe add 'IANA-related edit' in the minutes to make
