Thanks for the review, Wassim! And answers, Tiru.
Jari
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
___
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
Thanks!
Jari
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
___
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
Thanks again for your careful review, Peter!
And thank you Dhruv for looking into the one question.
Jari
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
___
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
Thanks for your review, Ralph!
Jari
On 20 Apr 2016, at 02:01, Ralph Droms (rdroms) wrote:
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
> Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
> by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat
Thanks for the review Peter, and for the updates, Vinay!
I do have a remaining question about the copyright. Do we have an answer?
Jari
On 21 Apr 2016, at 04:44, vinays wrote:
>
>
> Sent too soon. Please see inline at VC2.
>
> Thanks,
> -Vinay.
>
>
> On 4/20/16 10:41
Sorry for not replying sooner:
Check with the WG chair and the AD. My comments are to be treated like
anyone else in the WG or during Last Call who made comments on the
document.
pr
On 20 Apr 2016, at 13:49, Sriram, Kotikalapudi (Fed) wrote:
Pete,
I am working on the revision. When I am
Pete,
I am working on the revision. When I am done making the changes,
should I upload a new version using the IETF submission tool
or should I simply email the .txt or .xml only to you/Gen-art team?
Thanks.
Sriram
-Original Message-
From: Sriram, Kotikalapudi (Fed)
Sent: Wednesday,
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For more information, please see the FAQ at