Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-tram-stun-path-data-03

2016-04-20 Thread Jari Arkko
Thanks for the review, Wassim! And answers, Tiru. Jari signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Re: [Gen-art] review: draft-ietf-imapapnd-rfc2088bis-04

2016-04-20 Thread Jari Arkko
Thanks! Jari signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC/Telechat review of draft-ietf-pce-iro-update-06

2016-04-20 Thread Jari Arkko
Thanks again for your careful review, Peter! And thank you Dhruv for looking into the one question. Jari signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org

Re: [Gen-art] Gem-Art review of draft-ietf-lager-specification-11

2016-04-20 Thread Jari Arkko
Thanks for your review, Ralph! Jari On 20 Apr 2016, at 02:01, Ralph Droms (rdroms) wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed > by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-tictoc-ptp-mib-08

2016-04-20 Thread Jari Arkko
Thanks for the review Peter, and for the updates, Vinay! I do have a remaining question about the copyright. Do we have an answer? Jari On 21 Apr 2016, at 04:44, vinays wrote: > > > Sent too soon. Please see inline at VC2. > > Thanks, > -Vinay. > > > On 4/20/16 10:41

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-grow-route-leak-problem-definition-04

2016-04-20 Thread Pete Resnick
Sorry for not replying sooner: Check with the WG chair and the AD. My comments are to be treated like anyone else in the WG or during Last Call who made comments on the document. pr On 20 Apr 2016, at 13:49, Sriram, Kotikalapudi (Fed) wrote: Pete, I am working on the revision. When I am

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-grow-route-leak-problem-definition-04

2016-04-20 Thread Sriram, Kotikalapudi (Fed)
Pete, I am working on the revision. When I am done making the changes, should I upload a new version using the IETF submission tool or should I simply email the .txt or .xml only to you/Gen-art team? Thanks. Sriram -Original Message- From: Sriram, Kotikalapudi (Fed) Sent: Wednesday,

[Gen-art] Tele-chat Review of draft-ietf-dane-openpgpkey-10

2016-04-20 Thread Matt Miller (mamille2)
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For more information, please see the FAQ at