Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-netconf-yang-library-05

Thanks Vijay. > On Apr 29, 2016, at 7:57 AM, Vijay K. Gurbani wrote: > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on > Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at > . > > Please resolve these comments

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-Art review of draft-ietf-core-block-19

Jouni Korhonen wrote: > Hi Jouni, > > Just saying.. the use of NUM was not crystal clear just by reading the > draft and not having the followed the core block development & > discussion past few years. Right. I'm not sure I have fully addressed this one; all your other comments should be

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-grow-route-leak-problem-definition-04

Pete, Thank you very much for your careful reading and the detailed comments/suggestions. I found them all very helpful, and the new version (-05) that I just uploaded incorporates the changes you've recommended. Please take a look and let me know if I missed anything important.

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-Art review of draft-ietf-core-block-19

Hi Jouni, Just saying.. the use of NUM was not crystal clear just by reading the draft and not having the followed the core block development & discussion past few years. Thanks, Jouni 4/27/2016, 2:33 PM, Carsten Bormann kirjoitti: Hi Jouni, * The intoduction mentions that the

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-campbell-art-rfc5727-update-03

Thanks for the review, Vijay. Barry On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 11:15 AM, Vijay K. Gurbani wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on > Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at > . > > Please

[Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-campbell-art-rfc5727-update-03

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at . Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-campbell-art-rfc5727-update-03

[Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-netconf-yang-library-05

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at . Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-ietf-netconf-yang-library-05

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-roll-applicability-ami-12

Hi, Please see my follow-up e-mail. It shall be standards track. Sorry for the mess :) Regards, Christer On 29/04/16 12:53, "peter van der Stok" wrote: >Hi Christer, > >thanks for the review. >Do you propose to change the standards track objective to informational? >

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-roll-applicability-ami-12

Hi Christer, thanks for the review. Do you propose to change the standards track objective to informational? Peter Christer Holmberg schreef op 2016-04-29 11:48: I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at

[Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-roll-applicability-ami-12

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at Document: draft-ietf-roll-applicability-ami-12 Reviewer: Christer Holmberg Review Date: