Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-aqm-eval-guidelines-11

Thanks for your review, Ralph! I do think some of the points you raised need to be addressed. Inline: > > # > > I often react to the use of RFC 2119 language in an Informational document by > asking is that language really necessary? I'll ask the question here: in the > context of this I

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-teas-interconnected-te-info-exchange-05

Thanks for the review, Brian. I tend to agree with this: On 04 May 2016, at 20:48, Brian E Carpenter wrote: > Hi Deborah, > >> To help the reader, I'd say section 6's and section 7's headers should be >> more clearly labelled "An Abstraction Solution for Optical Domains and >> Networks" and

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART IETF Last Call review of draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6020bis-12

Jari Arkko wrote: > Thanks for this review, Dale. Do the authors have comments? Yes, I am working through the list, but I have unfortunately been very busy with my day job. I plan to get back to this review full time on friday or during the weekend. /martin _

[Gen-art] Gen-ART IETF Telechat review of draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6020bis-12

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft. For more information, please s

Re: [Gen-art] GenArt LC review: draft-ietf-tsvwg-rtcweb-qos-15

On 5/18/16 3:32 PM, Jari Arkko wrote: Thanks for the review, Paul, and thanks for the updates, Paul! Are we happy with the changes? My comments have been addressed. Jari ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/lis

Re: [Gen-art] GenArt LC review: draft-ietf-tsvwg-rtcweb-qos-15

This works for me (and I apologize for the slow response, I've been offline). RjS On 5/2/16 10:18 PM, Paul E. Jones wrote: Robert, I am finally getting an opportunity to make updates to the text. I have responses below... -- Original Message -- From: "Robert Sparks" To: "General Ar

Re: [Gen-art] GenArt LC review: draft-ietf-tsvwg-rtcweb-qos-15

Thanks for the review, Paul, and thanks for the updates, Paul! Are we happy with the changes? Jari signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ge

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART IETF Last Call review of draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6020bis-12

Thanks for this review, Dale. Do the authors have comments? Jari signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art