Re: [Gen-art] review of draft-ietf-mmusic-mux-exclusive-08.txt

Hi Francis, Thanks for your review! Please see inline. >I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review >Team (Gen-ART) reviews >all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please >treat these comments just like any other last call comments. >

[Gen-art] review of draft-ietf-mmusic-mux-exclusive-08.txt

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For more information, please see the FAQ at

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-nfsv4-multi-domain-fs-reqs-09

Hi, So we have this in the minutes: > Get status - is it in WG last call. Should it be informational > or standards draft. Draft clarifies how make all this work. ...i.e. it describes best practice, not protocol details. > > 2119 MUSTs, SHOULDs and MAYs can be used in an informational draft >

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-nfsv4-multi-domain-fs-reqs-09

> On Jul 5, 2016, at 11:54 AM, Brian E Carpenter > wrote: > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed > by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just > like any other last call com