Re: [Gen-art] Review: draft-ietf-pim-join-attributes-for-lisp-05

2016-10-19 Thread Dino Farinacci
> Two. One at all LISP sites (not one per LISP site) and part of the overlay > and possibly one in the underlay. > [Lucy] Thank, Dino. This is helpful. So the attributes proposed in this draft > is used in the first PIM instance, right? These attributes are only used by > ETRs to send join/prune

Re: [Gen-art] Review: draft-ietf-pim-join-attributes-for-lisp-05

2016-10-19 Thread Lucy yong
Dino, please see inline below. >> the draft assumes that PIM works within individual LISP sites but PIM >> mcast transport may not be supported among LISP sites. However the >> mechanism itself does not enforce a unique (unicast or mcast) >> underlay transport among LISP sites. Could some ET

Re: [Gen-art] Review: draft-ietf-pim-join-attributes-for-lisp-05

2016-10-19 Thread Dino Farinacci
>> the draft assumes that PIM works within individual LISP sites but PIM >> mcast transport may not be supported among LISP sites. However the >> mechanism itself does not enforce a unique (unicast or mcast) underlay >> transport among LISP sites. Could some ETRs request unicast transport, >> o

Re: [Gen-art] Review: draft-ietf-pim-join-attributes-for-lisp-05

2016-10-19 Thread Lucy yong
Hi Stig and Dino, Pls see inline below. -Original Message- From: Stig Venaas (svenaas) [mailto:s...@cisco.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2016 3:39 PM To: Lucy yong; draft-ietf-pim-join-attributes-for-l...@tools.ietf.org; A. Jean Mahoney; General Area Review Team Subject: Re: [Gen-art]

Re: [Gen-art] IESG telechat Gen-ART review of draft-harkins-salted-eap-pwd-06

2016-10-19 Thread Daniel Harkins
Hi Dale, I have posted an -07 of the draft that addresses all of your comments except the spacing after --. I'll leave that to the taste of the RFC editor. Sorry for the delay but I was waiting on another reviewer's agreement on resolution of his comments. Thanks for your patience. regar