[Gen-art] Telechat Review of draft-ietf-p2psip-share-09

2016-11-02 Thread Matt Miller
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For more information, please see the FAQ at < http://wiki.tools

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART telechat review of draft-ietf-netmod-routing-cfg-24

2016-11-02 Thread Brian E Carpenter
Lada, I don't feel strongly about it; it's between you and the IESG. FYI, that draft is in the editing stage, so will certainly be an RFC before yours. Regards Brian On 03/11/2016 04:59, Ladislav Lhotka wrote: > Brian, > > after looking into draft-ietf-6man-multi-homed-host-10, it seems to

[Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-httpauth-mutual-algo-06

2016-11-02 Thread Orit Levin
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For more information, please see the FAQ at

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART telechat review of draft-ietf-netmod-routing-cfg-24

2016-11-02 Thread Ladislav Lhotka
Brian, after looking into draft-ietf-6man-multi-homed-host-10, it seems to me that - this document doesn't change the set of router configuration parameters specified in RFC 4861, - our data model neither prevents nor discourages the settings recommended in draft-ietf-6man-multi-homed-host-1

Re: [Gen-art] review of draft-murchison-nntp-compress-05.txt

2016-11-02 Thread Jari Arkko
Many thanks for your review once again, Francis! Much appreciated. (NNTP? Long time no hear, but glad to see this doc! :-) ) Jari signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://w

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-stir-passport-09

2016-11-02 Thread Jari Arkko
Thank you for this review, Roni. Authors, did you notice Roni’s comment on IANA & RFC 7515 & security considerations? I also don’t see a change in the -10 version about this. (But many thanks also to the working group and the authors for completing this important document.) Jari signature.a

Re: [Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-stir-certificates-10

2016-11-02 Thread Jari Arkko
Thank you for this, Ralph. And thank you authors for completing this important document! I have balloted no-objection for this draft on tomorrow’s IESG telechat. Jari signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail ___ Gen-art m

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-art LC review of draft-ietf-netconf-yang-patch-12

2016-11-02 Thread Jari Arkko
Thank you! Jari On 27 Oct 2016, at 15:38, Christer Holmberg wrote: > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on > Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at > . > > Please resolve these comments along with any other Las

Re: [Gen-art] IESG Evaluation review of draft-ietf-stox-7248bis-13

2016-11-02 Thread Jari Arkko
Ralph, all: many thanks for the review & changes! Jari On 02 Nov 2016, at 03:06, Ralph Droms wrote: > (Correcting revision number of reviewed document) > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for draft-ietf-stox-7248bis-13. > > The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-l2tpext-keyed-ipv6-tunnel-07

2016-11-02 Thread Jari Arkko
Thanks for the review, Paul. I expect to see a document change to address the issues. Jari On 01 Nov 2016, at 15:44, Carlos Pignataro (cpignata) wrote: > Thanks for the review, Paul! > > Authors, > > Please find some comments inline. > > Carlos, as shepherd. > >> On Oct 31, 2016, at 10:20

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART telechat review of draft-ietf-netmod-routing-cfg-24

2016-11-02 Thread Jari Arkko
Thanks, all. I’m balloting no-objection. Jari On 01 Nov 2016, at 03:54, Brian E Carpenter wrote: > This didn't have a chance to be updated before the cutoff, > so technically it's still "Ready with Issues", but I am > completely happy with Lada's proposed changes. > > Regards > Brian > > On