Re: [Gen-art] [6tisch] Review of draft-ietf-6tisch-minimal-17

2016-12-13 Thread Xavi Vilajosana Guillen
Dear Brian, I will handle the proposed changes together with other reviews I received lately. I will produce v18 as soon as possible. thanks so much for your detailed review. X 2016-12-10 23:39 GMT+01:00 Brian Carpenter : > Reviewer: Brian Carpenter > Review result: Almost Ready > > Gen-ART Las

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-appsawg-file-scheme-14

2016-12-13 Thread Matthew Kerwin
Hi, From: Christer Holmberg [mailto:christer.holmb...@ericsson.com] Sent: Wednesday, 7 December 2016 16:23 > > Hi, > >>Thanks for the review, it dovetails nicely with other feedback I've >>received. >> >>Elsewhere this text has been suggested for the abstract: >> >>> This document provides a ful

[Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-pki-profiles-18

2016-12-13 Thread Dale Worley
Reviewer: Dale Worley Review result: Ready with Nits I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. Document:

Re: [Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-justfont-toplevel-05

2016-12-13 Thread Chris Lilley
On 2016-12-09 22:10:14, Dale Worley wrote: Major issue: Section 5.3.4, Collection Font Type (font/collection) Fragment Identifiers A string, no longer than 63 characters and restricted to the printable ASCII subset, codes 33 - 126, except for the 10 characters '[', ']', '(', ')', '{', '}', '<',

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART IETF Last Call review of draft-ietf-justfont-toplevel-03

2016-12-13 Thread Chris Lilley
On 2016-12-09 21:42:58, Dale R. Worley wrote: But I see a technical issue: RFC 6838 section 4.3 seems to leave parameter values to be case-sensitive, so if you want them to be case-insensitive, you are going to have to put that in the draft. Chris Lilley:  In fact I misunderstood your original c