Re: [Gen-art] Review of draft-mohali-dispatch-cause-for-service-number-12

At this point I will defer to the relevant ADs. As far as I can tell, although the entry was created by an Informational RFC, the registry still claims that it is standards track. And since this document is defining behavior, it behaves more like a standards track document than an Informational

Re: [Gen-art] Review of draft-mohali-dispatch-cause-for-service-number-12

> On Dec 15, 2016, at 10:35 PM, Joel M. Halpern wrote: > > I see your point about this adding a value to the entry created by RFC 4458. > Is there a reason this can not simply be PS? The fact that 4458 is > Informational does not, as far as I can tell, justify continuing the error. > While t

Re: [Gen-art] Review of draft-mohali-dispatch-cause-for-service-number-12

I see your point about this adding a value to the entry created by RFC 4458. Is there a reason this can not simply be PS? The fact that 4458 is Informational does not, as far as I can tell, justify continuing the error. While this is for a 3GPP usage, it appears to have been reviewed by the D

Re: [Gen-art] Review of draft-mohali-dispatch-cause-for-service-number-12

Hi Joel, Thanks for the comments. There has been a fair amount of discussion about the status of the draft. The situation is clearly not optimal, and I welcome input on how to straighten it out. The rational so far has been that this draft updates RFC 4588, which is informational. It adds so

[Gen-art] Review of draft-mohali-dispatch-cause-for-service-number-12

Reviewer: Joel Halpern Review result: Ready with Issues Major: This document defines a new code for use in SIP, and specifies new behavior both for the code itself and for its use in history-info. I am thus confused as to how this can be an informational RFC. It looks like it either Proposed

[Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-idr-deprecate-30-31-129-00

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For more information, please see the FAQ at

[Gen-art] Gen-ART Review Assignments - LC and Telechat

Hi all, The following reviewers have assignments: For telechat 2017-01-05 Reviewer LC end Draft Brian Carpenter2016-12-19 draft-adid-urn-02 * Elwyn Davies 2016-12-20 draft-ietf-manet-olsrv2-sec-threats-03 Wassim Haddad 2016-04-15 draft-ietf-sidr-as-m

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-art LC review: draft-ietf-6lo-dect-ule-08

Great - thanks! Jari On 16 Dec 2016, at 00:07, Jens Toftgaard Petersen wrote: > Hi Jari, > > All the comments have been addressed and the document is updated to new > revision -09. > > Best regards, > Jens > > > -Original Message- > From: Jari Arkko [mailto:jari.ar...@piuha.net] >

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-art LC review: draft-ietf-6lo-dect-ule-08

Hi Jari, All the comments have been addressed and the document is updated to new revision -09. Best regards, Jens -Original Message- From: Jari Arkko [mailto:jari.ar...@piuha.net] Sent: 15. december 2016 10:21 To: Robert Sparks Cc: General Area Review Team ; i...@ietf.org; 6...@iet

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-art LC review: draft-ietf-6lo-dect-ule-08

Hi Robert, Many thanks for your review. See my comments and answers inline below. Best regards, Jens -Original Message- From: Robert Sparks [mailto:rjspa...@nostrum.com] Sent: 28. november 2016 21:22 To: General Area Review Team ; i...@ietf.org; 6...@ietf.org; draft-ietf-6lo-dect-ule

Re: [Gen-art] Last Call Review of draft-ietf-manet-dlep-25

Thanks all. I have not yet reviewed -26 myself, but a quick perusal makes me think they have been addressed. As for my comments on the registries: Defining the review level within the table did throw me off. Looking at it again, I think it would be helpful to separate out the registry definitio

Re: [Gen-art] Last Call Review of draft-ietf-manet-dlep-25

Excellent - thanks! Jari signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Re: [Gen-art] gen-art review of draft-ietf-dprive-dnsodtls-12

Thanks for the review & fixes! Jari signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Re: [Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-pals-endpoint-fast-protection-04

Jari, Yes, Deborah will do the approval as revised draft needed, and comments from Suresh and others will then be addressed. Cheers, Andy On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 5:19 AM, Jari Arkko wrote: > Thanks for your in-depth review, Dale! Andy, I assume possible edits are > on their way in a new versi

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-appsawg-file-scheme-14

Christer, thank you for the review and I very much agree with your comments. Thanks Matthew and others for addressing the issue. Jari signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https

Re: [Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-6man-default-iids-16

Roni: thank you again for your review. Jari signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-6lo-dispatch-iana-registry-07

Russ, Gabriel, Thank you very much for the review and fixes. I have balloted “no-objection”. Jari signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ge

Re: [Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-pals-endpoint-fast-protection-04

Thanks for your in-depth review, Dale! Andy, I assume possible edits are on their way in a new version? Jari signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/l

Re: [Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-sidr-origin-validation-signaling-10

Thank you for your review(s) of this doc, Ralph! Jari signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat Call review of draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-algs-16

Thanks for your review, Meral! Jari On 15 Dec 2016, at 02:11, Meral Shirazipour wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review > Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the > IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from you

[Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-ops-12

Reviewer: Roni Even Review result: Almost Ready I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at . Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Docu

Re: [Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-justfont-toplevel-05

Dale: Thank you very much spotting these issues. And Chris, happy to see that the fix is already on the way! Jari signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mai

Re: [Gen-art] Last Call Review of draft-ietf-manet-dlep-25

Hi Jari, I have (belatedly) responded to Matt's comments which were on draft-25. A lot of his points were made by other reviewers and many have been addressed in draft-26 already. The IANA reviewer gave us good direction to the correct registration entries/format/detail, and I hope we have go

Re: [Gen-art] Last Call Review of draft-ietf-manet-dlep-25

Hi Matt, Thanks for the review, some (slightly late) comments inline... > -Original Message- > From: Matt Miller [mailto:mamil...@cisco.com] > Sent: 28 November 2016 16:58 > To: gen-art@ietf.org; draft-ietf-manet-dlep@ietf.org > Cc: i...@ietf.org > Subject: Last Call Review of draft-i

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-art LC review: draft-ietf-6lo-dect-ule-08

Many thanks for the in-depth review, Robert. Authors — are there any comments or updates to the document based on Robert’s feedback? Jari signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org

Re: [Gen-art] Last Call Review of draft-ietf-manet-dlep-25

Matt, Many thanks for this. Authors, did you have any responses on Matt’s comments? Also, Matt, I had one question for you: > > * The IANA registries this document establishes are not defined. > One can deduce the required information and its format, but there > is no guidance on review proces