Reviewer: Peter Yee
Review result: Ready with Nits
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For more inf
Hi,
Thank you.
Best,
Meral
> -Original Message-
> From: Randall Gellens [mailto:rg+i...@randy.pensive.org]
> Sent: Friday, January 06, 2017 4:07 AM
> To: Meral Shirazipour ; draft-ietf-ecrit-
> ecall@tools.ietf.org; gen-art@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-
Hi Ralph,
Thank you for the review. We will have all acronyms expansion in next version
and add a reference for DC services.
Regards,
Lucy
-Original Message-
From: Gen-art [mailto:gen-art-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Ralph Droms
Sent: Friday, January 06, 2017 7:14 AM
To: gen-art@iet
Kris; I totally agree with your explanation, but perhaps a slight editorial
change?
"This specification assumes the existence of one protocol identifier, P1, and
one cryptographic
key K2. P1’s purpose is to provide message integrity, it is not to provide
security.”
Pat
On 5, Jan2017, at 15:
Reviewer: Ralph Droms
Review result: Ready with Nits
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For more i
At 9:53 PM +0200 1/5/17, Dan Romascanu wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for the quick answer and for addressing my comments.
On respect to:
There is no conflict, as the eCall document applies to regions
that adhere to the E.U. eCall system, and this document applies to
other regions. I added the foll
Hi Meral,
Thank you for your review, I appreciate it. Please see inline.
At 12:11 AM + 1/6/17, Meral Shirazipour wrote:
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by
the IESG for the IETF Chair. P
