Re: [Gen-art] Review of draft-mohali-dispatch-cause-for-service-number-12

2017-01-27 Thread jmh.direct
Thank you.That seems a reasonable compromise among the constraints.  Ypyrs,Joel Sent via the Samsung Galaxy S® 6, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone Original message From: Ben Campbell Date: 1/27/17 14:17 (GMT-06:00) To: marianne.moh...@orange.com Cc: Joel Halpern , gen-art@ietf.org,

Re: [Gen-art] Review of draft-mohali-dispatch-cause-for-service-number-12

2017-01-27 Thread Ben Campbell
On 27 Jan 2017, at 11:15, marianne.moh...@orange.com wrote: Hi Joel, I have submitted a new version (v-13) of the draft. I have addressed your comment for IPv6 addresses format in the example. Concerning your major comment, the discussion is leaded by Ben. To that point: Please note that ve

[Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-payload-melpe-05

2017-01-27 Thread Brian Carpenter
Reviewer: Brian Carpenter Review result: Ready Gen-ART telechat review of draft-ietf-payload-melpe-05 I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from

Re: [Gen-art] Review of draft-mohali-dispatch-cause-for-service-number-12

2017-01-27 Thread marianne.mohali
Hi Joel, I have submitted a new version (v-13) of the draft. I have addressed your comment for IPv6 addresses format in the example. Concerning your major comment, the discussion is leaded by Ben. I hope I have correctly address your comment. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-mohali-dispatc