Reviewer: Ralph Droms
Review result: Ready
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For more information
On 01/24/2017 12:59 PM, Peterson, Jon wrote:
> Hey Vijay,
>
> Took me a bit to get back to you here, sorry. Appreciate the notes.
> Here's my thoughts.
Jon: No worries. I must also apologize for the delay in getting back
to you.
More inline (please see to end). I have re-arranged your comment
On 6 Feb 2017, at 7:36, Daniele Ceccarelli wrote:
Hi Jari, Pete,
First of all thanks for the accurate review.
All the nits/editorial comments are correct and will be fixed.
Regarding the minor issue:
4.1.1:
The figure is a bit confusing: There might not exist a "Max Slot
Width at Priority
Thanks Joel,
-11 only contains the fixes to the comments received by Jan. 17. I am now
applying all the edits needed for the comments received after that.
The next version will fix the problem you have pointed out.
Best,
Nat
On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 8:03 AM Joel Halpern wrote:
> Reviewer: Joel
Hi Jari, Pete,
First of all thanks for the accurate review.
All the nits/editorial comments are correct and will be fixed.
Regarding the minor issue:
> 4.1.1:
>
> The figure is a bit confusing: There might not exist a "Max Slot Width at
> Priority
> 7" if bit 7 is clear in the Priority field
Thanks for your review, Pete. Authors, any comments?
Jari
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
___
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
Hi,
I¹ve created a pull request with the changes based on Brian¹s comments.
https://github.com/cdh4u/draft-sctp-sdp/pull/10
Regards,
Christer
On 05/02/17 21:05, "Brian E Carpenter" wrote:
>Hi Christer,
>On 06/02/2017 03:14, Christer Holmberg wrote:
>> Hi Brian,
>>
>> Thanks for your revie