Re: [Gen-art] [DMM] Review of draft-ietf-dmm-4283mnids-04

Hello Dale, Follow-up below... On 2/12/2017 7:13 PM, Dale R. Worley wrote: There is a sort of "hidden" disadvantage to long names, especially for tiny devices using constrained link layers. Namely, a longer name makes it more likely to require lower-layer fragmentation. I'm not sure that it

Re: [Gen-art] [Pals] Review of draft-ietf-pals-mpls-tp-dual-homing-coordination-05

Hi Jouni, Thank you very much for your careful review and valuable comments. We authors will fix those issues late. B.R. Weiqiang Cheng -邮件原件- 发件人: Pals [mailto:pals-boun...@ietf.org] 代表 Jouni Korhonen 发送时间: 2017年2月14日 8:44 收件人: gen-art@ietf.org 抄送: draft-ietf-pals-mpls-tp-dual-homing-coo

Re: [Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-mpls-residence-time-13

Hi Robert, thank you for your review and patience as we've been working on the document. The text you've proposed is indeed useful to implementer and I'll add it with the next update. Regards, Greg On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 1:51 PM, Robert Sparks wrote: > Reviewer: Robert Sparks > Review result:

[Gen-art] Gen-Art Last Call review of draft-ietf-sidr-delta-protocol-06

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For more information, please see the FAQ at

[Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-pals-mpls-tp-dual-homing-coordination-05

Reviewer: Jouni Korhonen Review result: Ready with Nits I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For mor

Re: [Gen-art] Review of draft-leiba-rfc2119-update-01

Thanks, Robert, for the review. Barry On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 4:42 PM, Robert Sparks wrote: > Reviewer: Robert Sparks > Review result: Ready > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed > by the IESG fo

[Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-mpls-residence-time-13

Reviewer: Robert Sparks Review result: Ready I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version

[Gen-art] Review of draft-leiba-rfc2119-update-01

Reviewer: Robert Sparks Review result: Ready I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For more informati

Re: [Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07

And the tracker caught this, but to be complete in the archives, the Summary should have said "Ready for publication as an Internet Standard but with nits that should be considered before proceeding" On 2/13/17 3:08 PM, Robert Sparks wrote: Reviewer: Robert Sparks Review result: Ready with Ni

[Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07

Reviewer: Robert Sparks Review result: Ready with Nits I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For more

Re: [Gen-art] [DMM] Review of draft-ietf-dmm-4283mnids-04

"Sri Gundavelli (sgundave)" writes: > When we discussed this issue in the past, the general feedback from > the WG was that the draft should provide some minimal amount of > details on the new identifier types, what the identifier is, how the > identifier is constructed, what is the access technol

Re: [Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-6man-rfc1981bis-04

Hi Ole, > -Original Message- > From: ipv6 [mailto:ipv6-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of otr...@employees.org > Sent: Saturday, February 11, 2017 2:59 PM > To: C. M. Heard > Cc: 6man WG ; IETF ; Gen-ART > ; Suresh Krishnan ; > Stewart Bryant ; draft-ietf-6man-rfc1981bis@ietf.org > Subje

[Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-grow-mrt-add-paths-03

Reviewer: Vijay Gurbani Review result: Ready I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For more informati

Re: [Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-6man-rfc1981bis-04

Hi, On 2017-2-11, at 7:42, Suresh Krishnan wrote: > How does this work for UDP? See draft-ietf-tsvwg-rfc5405bis (which is in AUTH48), Section 3.2 "Message Size Guidelines". Lars signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP ___ Gen-art mai