Dear All,
changes are to address comments by Joel Halpern.
Regards,
Greg
-- Forwarded message --
From:
Date: Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 4:54 PM
Subject: New Version Notification for
draft-ietf-ippm-twamp-time-format-04.txt
To: Gregory Mirsky
Yes, that makes the relationship of the conditions significantly clearer.
Thank you,
Joel
On 3/3/17 5:46 PM, Greg Mirsky wrote:
Hi Joel,
thank you for your thorough review and the most helpful comments. I've
did s/proposal/specification/ through the document. As for the section
2.1 would the
Hi Joel,
thank you for your thorough review and the most helpful comments. I've did
s/proposal/specification/ through the document. As for the section 2.1
would the following text be clearer:
The rules of setting timestamp flags in
Modes field in server greeting and Set-Up-Response messages
Reviewer: Elwyn Davies
Review result: Ready
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For more
Reviewer: Stewart Bryant
Review result: Ready
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your
document shepherd or AD before posting a new
Reviewer: Stewart Bryant
Review result: Ready with Nits
Reviewer: Stewart Bryant
Review result: Ready with Nits
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these