Re: [Gen-art] [kitten] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-kitten-rfc5653bis-06

On 01/23/2018 06:43 PM, Weijun Wang wrote: > I've uploaded an updated version at > > > http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~weijun/rfc5653bis/draft-ietf-kitten-rfc5653bis-07.html This is a great format for reviewing these changes; thanks for generating it. Line 416 does not capitalize "optional" in

[Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat Call review of draft-mm-wg-effect-encrypt-15

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft. For more information,

[Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-bier-mvpn-09

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For more information, please see the FAQ at

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-trill-address-flush-05

HI Robert, On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 3:29 PM, Robert Sparks wrote: > Reviewer: Robert Sparks > Review result: Ready > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed > by the IESG for

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-farrel-sfc-convent-05

Thanks for the time, Robert. Adrian > -Original Message- > From: ietf [mailto:ietf-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Robert Sparks > Sent: 26 January 2018 20:14 > To: gen-art@ietf.org > Cc: draft-farrel-sfc-convent@ietf.org; i...@ietf.org; s...@ietf.org > Subject: Genart last call

[Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-trill-address-flush-05

Reviewer: Robert Sparks Review result: Ready I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For more

[Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-farrel-sfc-convent-05

Reviewer: Robert Sparks Review result: Ready I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For more

Re: [Gen-art] draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8022bis: Re: review of https://pad.isc.org/p/Kea_Planning_2018-01-25 (update)

Hi Francis, Thanks for the review. See inline. On 1/26/18, 3:29 AM, "Benoit Claise (bclaise)" wrote: Hi Francis, > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed > by

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ice-rfc5245bis-16

Hi Christer Thanks for your reply A few follow-up comments inline. On 26/01/2018 10:33, Christer Holmberg wrote: --- SB> You introduce Ta, but it would be so much kinder to the reader to SB> give it a real name. Ta was defined in RFC 5245, and it's commonly used in ICE-related

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ice-rfc5245bis-16

Hi Stewart, Thank You for the review! Please see inline. > Summary: This is a well written document and I am sure it will serve its >target audience > well. However Genart reviews take the perspective of someone new to the >field, and > although I am sure it is probably correct and complete

[Gen-art] draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8022bis: Re: review of https://pad.isc.org/p/Kea_Planning_2018-01-25 (update)

Hi Francis, I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft. For more