Hi Matthew,
On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 1:59 AM, Matthew Miller
wrote:
> Reviewer: Matthew Miller
> Review result: Ready with Nits
>
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
> Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being
A reasonable perspective. Could that be added to the document?
Yours,
Joel
On 3/8/18 6:33 PM, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Mar 8, 2018, at 5:28 PM, Joel Halpern wrote:
It is surprising in Section 3 Bullet 4 that reporting via email requires
that the report
> On Mar 8, 2018, at 5:28 PM, Joel Halpern wrote:
>
>It is surprising in Section 3 Bullet 4 that reporting via email requires
>that the report submitted use DKIM. Particularly while ignoring any
>security errors in communicating with the recipient domain.
Reviewer: Joel Halpern
Review result: Almost Ready
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For more
Francis,
Thanks for your review. My comments below…
On 3/5/18, 2:53 PM, "Francis Dupont" wrote:
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF
Hi all,
The following reviewers have assignments:
For telechat 2018-04-05
Reviewer Type LC end Draft
Brian CarpenterLast Call 2018-03-26 draft-ietf-6tisch-6top-protocol-10 *
Francis Dupont Telechat 2018-03-20 draft-ietf-tls-record-limit-02
Vijay Gurbani
Joel, thanks for your review. Göran, thanks for addressing Joel’s comment.
Unfortunately I ran out of time to review this document before the telechat.
Alissa
> On Feb 23, 2018, at 9:40 AM, Joel M. Halpern wrote:
>
> Yes, that is what I was looking for.
> Thank you,
>