Hi Dan,
Thank you very much for the thorough review.
Apologies for the delay. Procrastination and holiday came in the way.
See below.
> Reviewer: Dan Romascanu
> Review result: Almost Ready
>
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
> Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews a
Hi Ole,
Thanks for addressing my comments. All your answers to the minor and
editorial comments that I made are are fine with me.
Regards,
Dan
On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 5:10 PM, Ole Troan wrote:
> Hi Dan,
>
> Thank you very much for the thorough review.
> Apologies for the delay. Procrastinati
On 01/05/2018 02:10, Ole Troan wrote:
>> 4. Section 4 - It would be good to capitalize Standards Action, and refer to
>> RFC 8126 as reference (also to be added)
>
> Capitalisation done.
> I ended up leaning towards not referencing 8126. As most documents with IANA
> considerations don't. To
Hi Paul,
Thanks for the feedback.
> These don't state the precise meaning of "highest valued version".
I can clarify that the "highest valued version" means the version with the
highest major and minor numbers that the client supports. Would this be clear?
> For example, if the supplied version
The working group has discussed this approach to version negotiation a number
of times.
This is the result of a concensus decision by the work group that has held for
some time.
We should certainly clarify the spec where possible, but changing negotiation
at this point seems unlikely to get an
