[Gen-art] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-mtgvenue-meeting-policy-06

2018-05-21 Thread Roni Even
Reviewer: Roni Even Review result: Ready I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of

Re: [Gen-art] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-core-cocoa-03

2018-05-21 Thread Christer Holmberg
Hi, I did the gen-art review of this document more than 2 months ago, but I haven't seen any reply from the authors. Regards, Christer -Original Message- From: Gen-art [mailto:gen-art-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Christer Holmberg Sent: 16 March 2018 18:44 To: gen-art@ietf.org Cc: i.

[Gen-art] Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-v6ops-conditional-ras-04

2018-05-21 Thread Wassim Haddad
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For more information, please see the FAQ at: https://trac.ietf

Re: [Gen-art] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-softwire-dslite-yang-15

2018-05-21 Thread Alissa Cooper
Russ, thanks for your reviews of this document. I have entered a No Objection ballot. Alissa > On Apr 5, 2018, at 9:27 AM, Russ Housley wrote: > > Reviewer: Russ Housley > Review result: Ready > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Review Team (Gen-ART) revi

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-softwire-map-mib-12

2018-05-21 Thread Alissa Cooper
Meral, thanks for your review. I entered a No Objection ballot. Alissa > On Feb 23, 2018, at 2:02 PM, Meral Shirazipour > wrote: > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review > Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the > IE

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-ldp-interop-11

2018-05-21 Thread Joel Halpern Direct
Thank you. I apologize for missing the other normative items. With those, plus the elaboration on the SRMS, the status as PS makes good sense. Yours, Joel On 5/21/18 11:45 AM, Ahmed Bashandy wrote: Thanks a lot for the review The document specifies externally visible behavior that must be

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-ldp-interop-11

2018-05-21 Thread Ahmed Bashandy
Thanks a lot for the review The document specifies externally visible behavior that must be implemented by routers, otherwise SR and LDP routers cannot talk to each other. For example, section 4.2.2  specifies preference rules. Another example is the last two paragraphs in section 4.2.1. Hence