Acee,
I’m fine with leaving out positive. I was actually trying to cover the case
where someone might interpret the TLV definition to allow zero SRGBs. It’s
nonsensical, of course, to do so.
-Peter
On Jun 13, 2018, at 7:08 AM, Acee Lindem (acee) wrote:
Hi Pe
Hi Peter,
Thanks for thoroughly reviewing this document again and finding the nits. I
incorporated all your comments other than adding "positive" as while it is more
precise, it reads better without it and we don't want to imply that a TLV
length could ever be negative. See attached diff.
Than
Reviewer: Peter Yee
Review result: Ready with Nits
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For more inf
