Igor,
Thank you very much for the reply.
Are you saying that all the "common TE types" in this document have been
validated? If yes, then it is good. Thank you.
Just as a Gen-Art Directorate reviewer, I did my due-diligence to check the
common types defined in your draft are actually from
Dale, thanks for your review. I entered a DISCUSS ballot to sort out the issue
you raised about Section 8.
Alissa
> On May 5, 2019, at 10:21 PM, Dale Worley via Datatracker
> wrote:
>
> Reviewer: Dale Worley
> Review result: Ready with Issues
>
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this
Stewart, thanks for your review. I have entered a DISCUSS ballot based on a
couple of your points.
Alissa
> On May 13, 2019, at 8:54 AM, Stewart Bryant via Datatracker
> wrote:
>
> Reviewer: Stewart Bryant
> Review result: Almost Ready
>
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft.
Hi Linda,
Thank you for your comments.
Please, note that it was never a goal of this work to produce some sort of
Oxford English Dictionary for Traffic Engineering with providing references
illustrating basic and subtle usages of each ID of each defined TE related
definition (as OED does).
Russ, thanks for your review. Richard, thanks for your response. I entered a
Yes ballot. The IANA registration looks fine to me — we did the early
registration with just the same fields as specified in the document.
Alissa
> On Dec 19, 2018, at 11:46 AM, Richard Barnes wrote:
>
> Thanks for
Linda, thank you for your reviews of this document. I entered a Yes ballot.
Alissa
> On Mar 4, 2019, at 4:33 PM, Linda Dunbar wrote:
>
> Reviewer: Linda Dunbar
> Review result: Ready
>
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
> Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all
Reviewer: Peter Yee
Review result: Ready with Issues
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For more
