Hi,
>Some answers to your questions inline. I'm not sure further changes along the
>lines suggested here are needed, but I'm open to arguments that point in that
>direction.
I am mostly fine with your answers. Just a couple of comments inline still.
---
MIN_2:
Can the mechanism be used
Thanks Christer,
Some answers to your questions inline. I'm not sure further changes along
the lines suggested here are needed, but I'm open to arguments that point
in that direction.
On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 1:55 AM Christer Holmberg <
christer.holmb...@ericsson.com> wrote:
> Hi Nick,
>
> Thanks
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team
(Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF
Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments.
For more information, please see the FAQ at:
https://trac.ietf
Hi Nick,
Thanks for your reply! Please see inline.
>>MIN_1:
>>The last sentence of Section 1 says that the mechanism requires TLS version
>>1.2
>>or later. Would it be useful to state that in a dedicated Applicability
>>section?
>
> I'm disinclined to include an applicability section considerin
