-Original Message-
From: Linda Dunbar via Datatracker
Sent: Monday, August 3, 2020 5:38 PM
To: gen-art@ietf.org
Cc: draft-ietf-cbor-date-tag@ietf.org; last-c...@ietf.org; c...@ietf.org
Subject: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-cbor-date-tag-05
Reviewer: Linda Dunbar
Review
Reviewer: Linda Dunbar
Review result: Ready with Issues
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For
That seems reasonable to me.
Ludwig, are you able to raise the topic on the ACE list?
Thanks,
Ben
On Mon, Aug 03, 2020 at 02:21:12PM +, Seitz Ludwig wrote:
> I support Steffi's suggestion (i.e. make it pop-only here and allow non-pop
> profiles in the framework).
>
> /Ludwig
>
>
I support Steffi's suggestion (i.e. make it pop-only here and allow non-pop
profiles in the framework).
/Ludwig
-Original Message-
From: Stefanie Gerdes
Sent: den 3 augusti 2020 16:18
To: Seitz Ludwig ; Benjamin Kaduk ;
Paul Kyzivat
Cc: draft-ietf-ace-dtls-authorize@ietf.org;
Hi all,
On 08/03/2020 08:21 AM, Seitz Ludwig wrote:
* Also in section 3.3.1:
... This
specification assumes that the access token is a PoP token as
described in [I-D.ietf-ace-oauth-authz] unless specifically stated
otherwise.
Since no
> >> * Also in section 3.3.1:
> >>
> >> ... This
> >> specification assumes that the access token is a PoP token as
> >> described in [I-D.ietf-ace-oauth-authz] unless specifically stated
> >> otherwise.
> >>
> >> I think "assumes ... unless" should be "MUST ... unless".
> >
>
