Francesca, thanks for your review. Mohit, thanks for your response. I entered a
No Objection ballot.
Alissa
> On Sep 2, 2020, at 11:38 AM, Mohit Sahni wrote:
>
> Hi Francesca,
> Thanks for the comments, I will make these changes.
>
> Regards,
> Mohit
>
> On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 2:54 AM Fra
Interesting that the datatracker says the document is "Proposed Standard", but
the document has "Intend status: Informational". The two should be made to
agree.
- Bernie
> On Sep 9, 2020, at 8:45 PM, Fernando Gont wrote:
>
> Hello, Pete,
>
> Thanks a lot for your feedback! In-line
>
>
Tim, thanks for your review. I entered a No Objection ballot.
Alissa
> On Aug 13, 2020, at 7:49 PM, Tim Evens via Datatracker
> wrote:
>
> Reviewer: Tim Evens
> Review result: Ready
>
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
> Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IE
Hello, Pete,
Thanks a lot for your feedback! In-line
On 9/9/20 16:39, Pete Resnick via Datatracker wrote:
[]
Major issues: None
draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-slaac-renum
Minor issues:
The shepherd writeup says:
The document so far has been approved by the V6OPS working group
(successfu
Gyan, thanks for your review. Tarek, thanks for your response. I entered a No
Objection ballot.
Alissa
> On Aug 21, 2020, at 3:46 PM, Gyan Mishra wrote:
>
>
> Thanks Tarek
>
> I am all set with your responses which I figured the draft was a generic
> framework for future MPLS models.
>
Linda, thanks for your review. All, thanks for your responses. I entered a No
Objection ballot.
Alissa
> On Aug 5, 2020, at 12:44 PM, Mike Jones
> wrote:
>
> I agree with Jim's response to the comparison question.
>
> An RFC is being created because a tag is being registered in the
> Speci
Reviewer: Pete Resnick
Review result: Ready with Issues
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For mor
Hi Dan,
Thanks for your quick feedback and help.
Best Regards,
Paul
On Wed, Sep 9, 2020 at 3:18 PM Dan Romascanu wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> Thank you for your answers and for addressing my concerns. The revised
> version with the changes that you proposed is Ready from a Gen-ART review
> point of v
