Dale,
Sorry for not responding directly to your email.
Your concerns were addressed in -07 and more so in
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-idr-rfc8203bis-08
Regards,
Jakob.
-Original Message-
From: Dale Worley via Datatracker
Sent: Monday, July 13, 2020 8:33 PM
To:
Gyan, thanks for your review. Keyur, thanks for your responses. I entered a No
Objection ballot.
Alissa
> On Nov 13, 2020, at 4:47 PM, Gyan Mishra wrote:
>
>
> Thank you for the responses.
>
> I am all set for the document advancement.
>
> Gyan
> On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 4:21 PM Keyur
Christer, thanks for your review. Balázs, thanks for your response. I entered a
No Objection ballot.
Alissa
> On Oct 1, 2020, at 8:51 AM, Balázs Varga A
> wrote:
>
> Hi Christer,
>
> Thanks for the review. I agree with all your comments and will be corrected
> in next version. In detail:
Hi Vijay,
Thanks for the review! Since the QUIC WG uses a Github Workflow I've
created a separate issue for each of the items in your review, see in-line
responses for the precise issue link. All issues are track in the milestone
https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/milestone/22
We'd appreciate
Reviewer: Ines Robles
Review result: Ready with Nits
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For more
Brian,
On 12/1/20 8:13 PM, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
Hi Paul,
Comments in line. There's one definite good catch in your
review, and obviously more clarifications are needed.
I'll comment this one last time. Then I will be satisfied that I have
communicated my thoughts, and I'm happy with
Reviewer: Vijay Gurbani
Review result: Ready with Nits
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For
Hello
As mentioned previously, review comments raised during the genart http
review were captured as issues on the QUIC WG GitHub repository. These
issues have been assessed by the document editor(s) and shepherd, please
see each individual issue for more-specific discussion. As a summary, the
Hello,
As mentioned previously, review comments raised during the genart transport
review were captured as issues on the QUIC WG GitHub repository. These
issues have been assessed by the document editor(s) and shepherd, please
see each individual issue for more-specific discussion. As a summary,
Theresa, thanks for your review. I entered a No Objection ballot.
Alissa
> On Sep 27, 2020, at 6:09 PM, Theresa Enghardt via Datatracker
> wrote:
>
> Reviewer: Theresa Enghardt
> Review result: Ready
>
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
> Review Team
10 matches
Mail list logo
