Matt, thank you for your review. I have entered a No Objection ballot for this
document.
Lars
> On 2021-8-27, at 18:39, Matt Joras via Datatracker wrote:
>
> Reviewer: Matt Joras
> Review result: Ready with Nits
>
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
>
Paul, thank you for your review. I have entered a Discuss ballot for this
document, to make sure your review gets responded to and then discussed by the
IESG.
Lars
> On 2021-10-13, at 20:04, Paul Kyzivat wrote:
>
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review
Theresa, thank you for your review. I have entered a No Objection ballot for
this document.
Lars
> On 2021-9-16, at 21:12, Theresa Enghardt via Datatracker
> wrote:
>
> Reviewer: Theresa Enghardt
> Review result: Ready with Nits
>
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The
Looks like the same link got included twice? But thank you, I'll try to
rework the language again to reference that.
—Sam
On Mon, Oct 18, 2021, at 00:50, Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 11:25:01PM -0400, Dale R. Worley wrote:
>> "Sam Whited" writes:
>> >> The appearance of this