Re: [Gen-art] [Drip] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-drip-rid-24

2022-05-16 Thread Elwyn Davies
Hi, Bob. Sorry for the tardy reply.  Thanks for the responses, and, yes, I think the changes clear up the nits I identified.  Now good to go. Cheers, Elwyn On 16/05/2022 13:32, Robert Moskowitz wrote: Elwyn, I believe your comments are the only opens left.  Does this response and the

Re: [Gen-art] [Drip] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-drip-rid-24

2022-05-16 Thread Robert Moskowitz
Elwyn, I believe your comments are the only opens left.  Does this response and the current drip-rid-26 address your points? Note that the question sec 8.1 was addressed by IANA and is reflected in -26. Thank you. Bob On 5/10/22 21:13, Robert Moskowitz wrote: On 5/10/22 12:25, Elwyn

Re: [Gen-art] [lamps] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-lamps-cmp-updates-18

2022-05-16 Thread Brockhaus, Hendrik
Linda Thank you for your review and comment. There was a discussion at IETF 113 LAMPS meeting on CMP Updates style vs. RFC4210bis. Please see the meeting minutes: https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/113/materials/minutes-113-lamps-01.pdf As Russ points out in the shepherd writeup, the WG