Reviewer: Meral Shirazipour
Review result: Almost Ready
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team
(Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF
Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments.
For
Hello All,
I see that the IETF LC for this document is over and it is scheduled for
the upcoming IESG telechat. I wanted to poll to see if there was any
support or feedback for point (2) below and the IANA changes on the lines
suggested by Paul.
Thanks,
Ketan
On Wed, Sep 21, 2022 at 9:12 PM
Reviewer: Joel Halpern
Review result: Ready
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For more
Hi Joel
It was for this specific area it was requested. We did explore an
automated/mechanical way of doing this but in the end, it was easier to do by
hand. The organization of this MIB maps closely to the YANG model. In other
cases, I have dealt with existing MIBs and new YANG this is not
That suffices for the document and my review. Whether it suffices for
the community and IESG is up to them. (I wonder about the precedent of
defining MIBs for monitoring every new thing we do. But that is up to
others, not something you can fix in this document.)
Yours,
Joel
On 9/29/2022
Hi Joel
The reason this was requested by the community is that there is SNMP management
equipment deployed that they would like to be able use for monitoring IP-TFS.
I suggest I add this text to clearify.
OLD:
The objects defined here are the same as [I-D.ietf-ipsecme-yang-iptfs] with the
Hi all,
The following reviewers have assignments:
For telechat 2022-10-06
Reviewer Type LC end Draft
Pete Resnick Last Call 2022-09-20
draft-ietf-lsr-pce-discovery-security-support-11
For telechat 2022-10-20
Reviewer Type LC end Draft
