Re: [Gen-art] [OAUTH-WG] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-oauth-step-up-authn-challenge-11

2023-03-01 Thread Ryan Ridenour
Thank verybkudh and i really apprefiate it and i kno it is best dorewn foh see whag only knowing julia fousl sewe me what you fbunj u dont kniw mw dont hwfk shit sont wanna ever know bf withour trust thwre is never a good relarionehip and rhats whay i want her knowing ajd why ehwa nwver had a good

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-oauth-step-up-authn-challenge-11

2023-03-01 Thread Brian Campbell
On Wed, Mar 1, 2023 at 5:04 AM Christer Holmberg < christer.holmb...@ericsson.com> wrote: > Hi, > > QMa1: General > > As the document defines a new error code, and define new > WWW-Authenticate parameters, should the document not be an Update > to > RFC 6750? >

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-oauth-step-up-authn-challenge-11

2023-03-01 Thread Christer Holmberg
Hi, QMa1: General As the document defines a new error code, and define new WWW-Authenticate parameters, should the document not be an Update to RFC 6750? >>> It's a good point to consider. Our rationale is that this document >>> leverages >>> many different e