Dale, thank you for your review. I have entered a No Objection ballot for this
document.
Lars
> On Jan 22, 2024, at 17:46, Dale Worley via Datatracker
> wrote:
>
> Reviewer: Dale Worley
> Review result: Ready with Nits
>
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Paul, thank you for your review. I have entered a No Objection ballot for this
document.
Lars
> On Jan 22, 2024, at 21:09, Paul Kyzivat wrote:
>
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
> Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
> by the IE
Reviewer: Christer Holmberg
Review result: Ready
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For more infor
> Q1: There are a few places where the document says "Currently". I'd
> prefer to instead say something like "At the time of publishing this
> document". I do realize this issue already exists in RFC 9092.
sure. thanks.
randy
___
Gen-art mailing list
Hi all,
The following reviewers have assignments:
For telechat 2024-02-15
Reviewer Type LC end Draft
Lucas Pardue Last Call 2023-12-19 draft-ietf-detnet-yang-19
Last calls:
Reviewer Type LC end Draft
Stewart Bryant Last Call 2024-
Reviewer: Russ Housley
Review result: Not Ready
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your
document shepherd or AD before posting a new vers
Reviewer: Joel Halpern
Review result: Ready
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.
For more informatio