On Feb 22, 2024, at 17:36, Paul Kyzivat wrote:
>
>
> But, if I am asked to do a telechat review of this document I will raise the
> issue so that the IESG think about it. Then it will be their call.
Note you don’t have to wait to be invited for that. During last-call, voice
what you want to
Daniel,
On 2/22/24 4:28 PM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
On Thu 2024-02-22 15:41:35 -0500, Paul Kyzivat wrote:
But I do encourage you to say *something* about web server based email
clients, since they are such a big part of the ecosystem. (What
percentage of all emails have gmail on at least
Hi all,
The following reviewers have assignments:
For telechat 2024-02-29
Reviewer Type LC end Draft
Matt Joras Last Call 2024-02-05 draft-ietf-ippm-ioam-yang-11
Pete Resnick Last Call 2024-02-12
draft-ietf-netconf-tls-client-server-38
For telechat
On Thu 2024-02-22 15:41:35 -0500, Paul Kyzivat wrote:
> But I do encourage you to say *something* about web server based email
> clients, since they are such a big part of the ecosystem. (What
> percentage of all emails have gmail on at least one end?) Perhaps
> discuss the limitations on
Daniel,
Thanks for the explanation. This all sounds good to me.
But I do encourage you to say *something* about web server based email
clients, since they are such a big part of the ecosystem. (What
percentage of all emails have gmail on at least one end?) Perhaps
discuss the limitations on
Hi Paul--
Thanks for this review! I've just staged some minor cleanup edits in
git (https://gitlab.com/dkg/e2e-mail-guidance/) that should address your
concerns. After my co-editors have had a chance to review and discuss,
we'll probably roll them up with the suggestions from other reviewers
Dear Ines
Thanks you for your review. Please see inline.
Stewart
> On 27 Nov 2023, at 21:41, Ines Robles via Datatracker
> wrote:
>
> Reviewer: Ines Robles
> Review result: Almost Ready
>
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
> Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews
