Re: [Gen-art] [manet] Review of draft-ietf-manet-olsrv2-sec-threats-03

I recommend that if a reviewer did not find the answer to the simple security question then the answer should be clear in the document. Please note that this protocol has many RFCs involved but still this draft needs to answer clearly the security threat questions. I think maybe the confusion is

Re: [Gen-art] GEN-ART telechat review of draft-farrell-perpass-attack-05

On Friday, January 31, 2014, Sam Hartman wrote: Thanks Scott. In the interest of being clear about my position, I support publication of 04 but do not support publication of 05. I don't know why you object 05. I think all the discussion that is useful has happened and all that remains is