Hi Behcet,
Thanks for your review
On Mon, May 27, 2024 at 6:07 PM Behcet Sarikaya via Datatracker <
nore...@ietf.org> wrote:
> Reviewer: Behcet Sarikaya
> Review result: Ready with Nits
>
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
> Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews al
Hi Sue,
Thanks for your review.
On Fri, May 24, 2024 at 12:32 AM Susan Hares via Datatracker <
nore...@ietf.org> wrote:
> Reviewer: Susan Hares
> Review result: Ready with Issues
>
> GEN-ART review
>
> Status: Ready with Issues
> Type of issues: Technical issues + Editorial issues
>
> General C
Hi Christer,
On Tue, Dec 12, 2023 at 1:05 AM Russ Housley wrote:
> Hi Christer.
>
> >> Section 2.3 of RFC 8446 explains that the security provided to early
> data is
> >> weaker than
> >> the security provided to other kinds of TLS data. This is the reason
> that
> >> PCEPS MUST NOT
> >> make u
Hi Alissa,
An update has been posted that makes changes based on the genart
review by the authors -
https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url1=draft-ietf-pce-association-diversity-10&url2=draft-ietf-pce-association-diversity-12
A response to the Dale's email discussing these changes is pending.
Dhruv
O
Hi Francesca,
Thanks for your review. Few thoughts...
On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 5:44 PM Francesca Palombini via Datatracker
wrote:
>
> Reviewer: Francesca Palombini
> Review result: Ready with Issues
>
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
> Review Team (Gen-ART) re
Hi Pete,
Thanks for your review and nits. Just snipping to two points...
> OLD
> | PT | Path Protection Association Flags |S|P|
> NEW
> | PT |Unassigned |S|P|
>
I feel it is important to keep the name "flags" in the figure t
Hi Erik,
Thank you for your review and suggestions. We will update in the next revision.
Thanks!
Dhruv
On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 7:28 AM Erik Kline via Datatracker
wrote:
>
> Reviewer: Erik Kline
> Review result: Ready with Nits
>
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General A
Hi Paul,
Thanks for your review, please see inline...
On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 9:58 PM Paul Kyzivat wrote:
>
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
> Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
> by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat the
Hi Meral,
Thanks for your review.
> Nits/editorial comments:
>
> It could help to clarify if this proposal brings any new requirements on
> existing LSP OAM/path protection techniques, or brings the need for
> extensions.
Associating LSPs together to form a association group in the context
of
how they parse
>and process the messages, objects, and TLVs in case they come,
>accidentally, from another experiment.
>
> There are a few words in https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6709#section-5
> that might also be relevant. An experimental code point is in effect a
> protoco
ks?
Regards,
Dhruv
Working copy:
https://github.com/dhruvdhody-huawei/ietf/blob/master/draft-ietf-pce-rfc6006bis-04.txt
> -Original Message-
> From: Roni Even
> Sent: 19 August 2017 19:51
> To: Dhruv Dhody ; Roni Even
> ; gen-art@ietf.org
> Cc: draft-ietf-pce-rfc
gt; Minor issues:
>
> Nits/editorial comments:
>
> 1. In section 4.2 I am not sure why is this sentence there, is it for the
> current yang document or for a future one. Why have it at all?-"The PCEP
> YANG module [I-D.ietf-pce-pcep-yang] can be extended to also include t
Hi Dale,
> -Original Message-
> From: Dale R. Worley [mailto:wor...@ariadne.com]
> Sent: 02 August 2017 08:10
> To: Dhruv Dhody
> Cc: gen-art@ietf.org; draft-ietf-pce-pceps@ietf.org; p...@ietf.org;
> i...@ietf.org; dhruv.i...@gmail.com
> Subject: Re: [
interpretation it can, in some cases[1]. I would let the authors confirm on
this.
Thanks,
Dhruv
[1] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/bexK_Nc2wHgQzV-XUC8lqMec8zY
> -Original Message-
> From: Joel M. Halpern [mailto:j...@joelhalpern.com]
> Sent: 17 February 2017 10:13
> To:
Hi Joel,
Regarding your comment -
> Is the intention to prohibit the driving
> of LSP creation from the PCE?
This capability is described in -
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-pce-pce-initiated-lsp-07 (document
expired recently, authors should refresh it)
Thanks,
Dhruv
> -Origin
Hi Peter,
Thanks for the diligent review! See Inline...
On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 1:40 AM, Peter Yee wrote:
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review
> Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for
> the IETF Chair. Please wait for di
Thanks Brian!
Thanks Pavan!
Happy Diwali :)
On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 11:16 AM, Brian E Carpenter <
brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
> On 13/11/2015 18:25, Vishnu Pavan Beeram wrote:
> > Brian, Hi!
> >
> > Please see inline (prefixed [VPB])
> >
> > Regards,
> > -Pavan (as the Document S
Hi Brian,
Let me apologies again for keeping you waiting for a reply.
The reply to this would be the same as "Gen-ART telechat review of
draft-ietf-teas-rsvp-te-domain-subobjects-03" sent today.
We can continue the discussion on that thread?
Regards,
Dhruv
On Sat, Nov 7, 2015 at 3:55 AM, Brian
Hi Brian,
Thanks for your review and sorry for the delay in the reply [ Diwali
festivities in these neck of woods :) ]
Please see inline...
On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 9:12 AM, Brian E Carpenter <
brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General
t and IANA
review changes so far.
Regards,
Dhruv
> -Original Message-
> From: Julien Meuric [mailto:julien.meu...@orange.com]
> Sent: 03 November 2015 00:57
> To: Dhruv Dhody; Joel Halpern Direct; Dhruv Dhody
> Cc: A. Jean Mahoney; General Area Review Team; draft-ietf-pc
IGP area
is to be excluded.
I have attached the working copy diff for easy reference.
Regards,
Dhruv
> -Original Message-
> From: Dhruv Dhody
> Sent: 02 November 2015 00:33
> To: 'Julien Meuric'; Joel Halpern Direct; Dhruv Dhody
> Cc: A. Jean Mahoney; Genera
Hi All,
Sorry for delay in replying, let me try to send you proposed text tomorrow as
per Julien's suggestion!
Regards,
Dhruv
> -Original Message-
> From: Julien Meuric [mailto:julien.meu...@orange.com]
> Sent: 31 October 2015 00:35
> To: Joel Halpern Direct; Dh
Hi Joel,
Thanks for a review. See inline...
On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 2:42 AM, Joel M. Halpern
wrote:
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
> Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
> by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these com
23 matches
Mail list logo
