Thanks for the quick turnaround, Russ! I've corrected this in my working copy. Will wait a couple more days in case there are other nits or comments coming in...
Thanks, Gabriel > -----Original Message----- > From: Russ Housley [mailto:hous...@vigilsec.com] > Sent: Thursday, December 8, 2016 14:04 > To: draft-ietf-6lo-dispatch-iana-registry....@ietf.org > Cc: IETF Gen-ART <gen-art@ietf.org> > Subject: Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-6lo-dispatch-iana-registry-07 > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review > Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the > IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before > posting a new version of the draft. > > For more information, please see the FAQ at > <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. > > Document: draft-ietf-6lo-dispatch-iana-registry-07 > Reviewer: Russ Housley > Review Date: 2016-12-08 > IETF LC End Date: 2016-12-08 > IESG Telechat date: 2016-12-15 > > Summary: Ready > > Thank you for addressing my comments on version -06 of this document. > > > Major Concerns: None > > Minor Concerns: None > > Nit: In Section 1, paragraph 1, it says: > > ... not defined in either [RFC4944] and [RFC6282]. > > s/and/or/ _______________________________________________ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
