Re: [Gen-art] [tcpm] [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-tcpm-2140bis-09

2021-03-16 Thread Joseph Touch
Hi, Theresa, FYI - v10 just posted. Please let me know if this update needs further adjusting. Joe > On Mar 15, 2021, at 11:25 PM, Joseph Touch wrote: > > FWIW, an update is coming soon. Regarding one point below: > >> On Mar 3, 2021, at 6:28 PM, Theresa En

Re: [Gen-art] [tcpm] [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-tcpm-2140bis-09

2021-03-15 Thread Joseph Touch
FWIW, an update is coming soon. Regarding one point below: > On Mar 3, 2021, at 6:28 PM, Theresa Enghardt wrote: > >>> For a better overview, maybe it would help if these discussion >>> points/considerations were grouped by the TCB value being discussed, and >>> possibly provided as a list? >> T

Re: [Gen-art] [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-tcpm-2140bis-09

2021-03-03 Thread Joseph Touch
Hi,Theresa, Many thanks for the review. I think we can address the issues below in the next rev easily. I’ve added some comments below to confirm the way forward. Please let us know if you have any concerns with the replies below, but otherwise we will have an update posted after the ID submis

Re: [Gen-art] CALL to revoke last call: Re: [tsvwg] Request for working group feedback on draft-kuehlewind-system-ports (6th March, 2020)

2020-02-26 Thread Joseph Touch
Hi, Alexey, Thanks for letting me know. Joe > On Feb 26, 2020, at 8:07 AM, Alexey Melnikov wrote: > > Hi Joe, > > I discussed this document with TSV ADs and here is what is going to happen > next: > > 1) IETF LC on this document will run to the end (i.e. will not be cancelled), > so that w