[Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-cdni-delegation-acme-03

Reviewer: Lucas Pardue Review result: Ready I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For more

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dnsop-caching-resolution-failures-06

Hi Wesley, Thanks for the response, see mine in-line. On Mon, Aug 21, 2023 at 10:07 PM Wessels, Duane wrote: > > > > On Aug 11, 2023, at 5:36 AM, Lucas Pardue via Datatracker < > nore...@ietf.org> wrote: > > > > Caution: This email originated from outside the o

[Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-dnsop-caching-resolution-failures-06

Reviewer: Lucas Pardue Review result: Ready with Issues I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments

Re: [Gen-art] [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-httpbis-digest-headers-11

Hi Rob, On Thu, 1 Jun 2023, 23:12 Rob Sayre, wrote: > Hi, > > I put up a PR: > https://github.com/httpwg/http-extensions/pull/2561 > > The current text is something one would hear in spoken American English, > but it's not usually done in writing, and it mixes pluralization and the > passive

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-httpbis-digest-headers-11

Hi Joel, Thank you for the review. Cheers Lucas On Sat, 18 Mar 2023, 03:02 Joel Halpern via Datatracker, wrote: > Reviewer: Joel Halpern > Review result: Ready > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-httpbis-priority-10

Hi Ines, Thank you for the review and providing feedback. On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 8:42 PM Ines Robles via Datatracker < nore...@ietf.org> wrote: > Reviewer: Ines Robles > Review result: Ready with Nits > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Review Team

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-quic-recovery-32

Hi Vijay, Thanks for the review! Since the QUIC WG uses a Github Workflow I've created a separate issue for each of the items in your review, see in-line responses for the precise issue link. All issues are track in the milestone https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/milestone/22 We'd appreciate

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-quic-http-32

://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4358 Kinds regards Lars and Lucas QUIC WG Co-chairs On Sun, Nov 15, 2020 at 7:02 PM Lucas Pardue wrote: > Hi Theresa, > > Thanks for the review! Since the QUIC WG uses a Github Workflow I've > created a separate issue for each of the items in

Re: [Gen-art] [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-quic-transport-32

Hello, As mentioned previously, review comments raised during the genart transport review were captured as issues on the QUIC WG GitHub repository. These issues have been assessed by the document editor(s) and shepherd, please see each individual issue for more-specific discussion. As a summary,

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-quic-http-32

Hi Theresa, Thanks for the review! Since the QUIC WG uses a Github Workflow I've created a separate issue for each of the items in your review and tagged you in it, see in-line responses for the precise issue link. All issues are track in the milestone