Hi David,
Thanks, the new text is clearer
Roni
> -Original Message-
> From: Gen-art [mailto:gen-art-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Black, David
> Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2020 1:20 AM
> To: Roni Even; gen-art@ietf.org
> Cc: Black, David; last-c...@ietf.org; det...@ietf.org; draft-ietf-detn
Vijay thanks,
The document will be published as an Informational RFC and not a proposed
standard.
Roni
> -Original Message-
> From: Vijay Gurbani via Datatracker [mailto:nore...@ietf.org]
> Sent: Monday, February 24, 2020 6:45 PM
> To: gen-art@ietf.org
> Cc: draft-ietf-avtcore-multiplex-g
Hi Al,
I am OK with all the changes
Roni
> -Original Message-
> From: MORTON, ALFRED C (AL) [mailto:a...@research.att.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2019 3:41 AM
> To: Roni Even (A); gen-art@ietf.org; last-c...@ietf.org; ali...@cooperw.in
> Cc: i...@ietf.org; draft-i
C (AL) [mailto:a...@research.att.com]
> Sent: Thursday, December 05, 2019 4:04 PM
> To: Roni Even (A); gen-art@ietf.org; last-c...@ietf.org
> Cc: i...@ietf.org; draft-ietf-ippm-metric-registry@ietf.org; Mirja
> Kuehlewind; Alissa Cooper
> Subject: RE: [ippm] Genart last call review of
> dra
since the policy is
specification required
Roni Even
> -Original Message-
> From: Alissa Cooper [mailto:ali...@cooperw.in]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 04, 2019 8:00 PM
> To: Mirja Kuehlewind
> Cc: Roni Even (A); MORTON, ALFRED C (AL); Roni Even; gen-art@ietf.org;
Hi Al,
I saw that IANA was consulted during the work.
I was wondering what will be the actual text that will be written in the IANA
registry, I expected section 10 to describe it.
Registration Procedure(s)
Reference
Note
I am not sure yet what is the Registration Procedure and what will be writt
HI Rifaat,
OK, no other comments
Roni
From: Rifaat Shekh-Yusef [mailto:rifaat.i...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2019 3:25 PM
To: Roni Even (A)
Cc: Roni Even; last-c...@ietf.org; gen-art@ietf.org; SIPCORE;
draft-ietf-sipcore-digest-scheme@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Genart
Rifaat thanks,
See in line
Roni
On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 4:38 AM Roni Even via Datatracker
mailto:nore...@ietf.org>> wrote:
Reviewer: Roni Even
Review result: Almost Ready
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being p
Hi Med,
Thanks, I have no further comments
Roni
-Original Message-
From: mohamed.boucad...@orange.com [mailto:mohamed.boucad...@orange.com]
Sent: Monday, September 23, 2019 9:19 AM
To: Roni Even (A); Jaime Jiménez; Roni Even
Cc: draft-ietf-core-hop-limit@ietf.org; gen-art@ietf.org
Hi,
I looked at section 5.4.6 and now I understand that the option is elective,
non-repeatable and part of cache key.
That will mean that the option number should have the two least significant
bits as 0 and the next 3 bits some combination that is not all 1's, see also
https://tools.ietf.org/ht
Hi,
I still do not think that the following sentence in section 5.2 text "The
policy dictating when the MAC address is changed on the 802.11-OCB interface is
to-be-determined." make sense. I think that a sentence that will say
“implementations should use a policy dictating when the MAC address is
Inline
From: Roni Even (A) [mailto:roni.e...@huawei.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2019 1:41 AM
To: dick...@alum.mit.edu<mailto:dick...@alum.mit.edu>; 'NABIL BENAMAR'; 'Roni
Even'
Cc: gen-art@ietf.org<mailto:gen-art@ietf.org>; &
document. I also noticed
that there is support in IEEE SA - 1609.4-2016 for MAC address change.
Roni Even
From: Dick Roy [mailto:dick...@alum.mit.edu]
Sent: Monday, June 17, 2019 10:48 PM
To: Roni Even (A); 'NABIL BENAMAR'; 'Roni Even'
Cc: gen-art@ietf.org; 'IETF Discussio
Thanks,
The only comment left is:
2. In section 5.2 "The policy dictating when the MAC address is changed on the
802.11-OCB interface is to-be-determined.". Reading the next sentence it looks
to me that this is needed as part of the solution and should not be left for
the unknown future.
Should w
Linda,
The LC ended March 18, the Telechat is April 11th
Roni
-Original Message-
From: Gen-art [mailto:gen-art-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Linda Dunbar
Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2019 11:17 AM
To: maho...@nostrum.com; gen-art@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Review Assignments
Jean,
I
Hi Med,
Thanks I am OK with your response only open one
> administrator even if rejected.
[Med] This is deployment-specific. For example, if conflict handling requires
"notify an administrator for validation", there is no point to report again.
[RE] Yes but for example "reject all" may cause a
Scott thanks for clarifying to me.
I have no further comments
Roni
-Original Message-
From: Gen-art [mailto:gen-art-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Hollenbeck, Scott
Sent: Monday, February 04, 2019 2:33 PM
To: ron.even@gmail.com; gen-art@ietf.org
Cc: i...@ietf.org; draft-hollenbeck-vcar
Hi Marc,
Thanks, these changes address all my comments
Roni
-Original Message-
From: Gen-art [mailto:gen-art-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Marc Petit-Huguenin
Sent: Monday, September 17, 2018 3:34 PM
To: Roni Even; gen-art@ietf.org
Cc: i...@ietf.org; t...@ietf.org; draft-ietf-tram-stun-pm
Hi Paul,
I am OK with your response
Thanks
Roni
-Original Message-
From: Gen-art [mailto:gen-art-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Paul Hoffman
Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2018 5:57 PM
To: Roni Even
Cc: gen-art@ietf.org; i...@ietf.org; dn...@ietf.org;
draft-ietf-dnsop-terminology-bis@iet
Hi Suresh,
The proposed text works for me.
Regards
Roni
-Original Message-
From: Gen-art [mailto:gen-art-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Suresh Krishnan
Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2018 2:28 AM
To: Roni Even
Cc: mtgve...@ietf.org; gen-art@ietf.org; i...@ietf.org;
draft-ietf-mtgvenue-meeting-
Hi Miika,
All your responses are OK with me.
As for posting a new version, I think it will be good to submit one with all
the changes that came in the IETF LC
Roni
-Original Message-
From: Gen-art [mailto:gen-art-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Miika Komu
Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2018
21 matches
Mail list logo
