Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-idr-bgp-open-policy-18

2022-01-07 Thread Sriram, Kotikalapudi (Fed)
Gyan, >I think the document needs to clearly state that the role priority by itself >does not have an import policy that is automatically configured. The import >policy is based on OTC Attribute. The document should also clearly state that >Role priority must be used in conjunction with OTC a

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-idr-bgp-open-policy-18

2022-01-05 Thread Sriram, Kotikalapudi (Fed)
Hi Gyan, Thank you. Please see the responses inline. Gyan> Agreed that is acceptable. In the description as well maybe listing a pecking order similar to what is described in Gao-Rexford model style route preference in the import and export policy verbiage for each role. [KS/AA]: That is intere

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-idr-bgp-open-policy-18

2022-01-04 Thread Sriram, Kotikalapudi (Fed)
Hi Gyan, [I am following up on the messages exchanged between Alvaro and you this morning. Thanks to both of you for that.] Sorry for the delay in replying (considering your original review date). Thank you for your careful review and comments/nits. Please see responses marked with [KS/AA] be

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-protocol-20

2016-12-29 Thread Sriram, Kotikalapudi (Fed)
lto:hous...@vigilsec.com] Sent: Wednesday, December 28, 2016 12:46 PM To: Sriram, Kotikalapudi (Fed) Cc: draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-protocol@ietf.org; IETF SecDir Subject: Re: SecDir Review of draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-protocol-20 Sriram: Thanks for your very comprehensive response to my review

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-grow-route-leak-problem-definition-04

2016-04-29 Thread Sriram, Kotikalapudi (Fed)
Pete, Thank you very much for your careful reading and the detailed comments/suggestions. I found them all very helpful, and the new version (-05) that I just uploaded incorporates the changes you've recommended. Please take a look and let me know if I missed anything important. https://tools.

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-grow-route-leak-problem-definition-04

2016-04-20 Thread Sriram, Kotikalapudi (Fed)
Pete, I am working on the revision. When I am done making the changes, should I upload a new version using the IETF submission tool or should I simply email the .txt or .xml only to you/Gen-art team? Thanks. Sriram -Original Message- From: Sriram, Kotikalapudi (Fed) Sent: Wednesday

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-grow-route-leak-problem-definition-04

2016-03-30 Thread Sriram, Kotikalapudi (Fed)
Pete, Thank you for your review and comments. I'll be happy to incorporate all the changes you've suggested. I've been a bit swamped. What is a reasonable turnaround time for these? OK if I get this done within the next week or two? When I am done making the changes, should I upload a version -05