me similar/related recommendations, especially 7.3)?
I am not aware of any IPR disclosures that would be warranted for
draft-cheshire-sudn-ipv4only-dot-arpa.
Stuart Cheshire
___
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
upport Zero
Configuration operation where that is desired.
We should let the RFC Editor update the references at publication time --
there’s little benefit in chasing a moving target.
Stuart Cheshire
___
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@iet
TCP connections used for?
Answer: Every application that uses TCP today still uses TCP when TCP
is running over the IPSEC VPN.
BTMM is an IPv6 overlay network, tunneled over IPv4. Every TCP-based
application you run is still a TCP-based application.
Stuart Cheshire
* Wizard Without
if someone was trying to learn how mDNS is used in
service discovery, he might be disappointed to read this far before
they discover he was in the wrong place.
Moved to introduction.
Stuart Cheshire
* Wizard Without Portfolio, Apple Inc.
* www.stuartcheshire.org
uot;The simple rules for case-insensitivity in
Unicast DNS also apply..."
Reference?
Fixed: [RFC1034] [RFC1035]
-- 18, paragraph 3: "...,a Multicast DNS Responder SHOULD send the
Resource Record alone, in a single IP datagram, sent using multiple
IP fragments."
I have tr
s not, which is why I wrote this document.
Also idnits suggests that RFC 2462 should be replaced by RFC4862
which obsoleted it.
Fixed.
Stuart Cheshire
* Wizard Without Portfolio, Apple Inc.
* www.stuartcheshire.org
___
Gen-art mailing list
Gen-art@iet
broadcast ARP Replies SHOULD NOT be used
>
>Spencer: slightly confused about why SHOULD NOT, if this is not a
>problem in most cases. Is this stronger (or broader) than it needs to be?
The "SHOULD NOT" term is used in the "harm to the network" sense, i.e.
"Some people
