your recommended text on redundancy model.
regards,
Victor K
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 1:33 PM, Martin Thomson martin.thom...@gmail.comwrote:
On 15 January 2014 19:40, Victor Kuarsingh vic...@jvknet.com wrote:
Which seems wise given their somewhat contentious nature
Martin,
I am loading a new new version today, but here is that section (originally
called Motivation) for quick review.
** Beginning of section **
Existing Network Considerations (new name of section)
The selection of CGN may be made by an operator based on a number of
factors. The overall
Jari/Martin,
With respect to section 6, I agree we can remove the odd text and I will
follow Martin's suggestion. The inclusion of that text was a bit
historical as the document was actual first drafted before RFC6598.
I would agree that (as this point) that text, as I have in the document,
Martin,
My responses in-line
On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 1:44 PM, Martin Thomson martin.thom...@gmail.comwrote:
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq.
Please resolve these
Benoit/Martin,
I apologize. I seem to have missed reading that email. I review and replay.
regards,
Victor K
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 12:10 PM, Benoit Claise bcla...@cisco.com wrote:
Dear authors, doc. shepherd,
Can you please answer Martin.
Regards, Benoit
I am the assigned Gen-ART
